Fair comments and you echo my thoughts exactly! This is one of those cases where It’s tough, for the ordinary person, to separate the science from the hype.

I’m hoping we are raising awareness of what is going on so that better minds than mine can start to sort this out and help us to understand the issues.

This is a story I will be watching and hopefully will be able to help write about again.

Fair comments and you echo my thoughts exactly! This is one of those cases where It’s tough, for the ordinary person, to separate the science from the hype.

I’m hoping we are raising awareness of what is going on so that better minds than mine can start to sort this out and help us to understand the issues.

This is a story I will be watching and hopefully will be able to help write about again.

Fair comments and you echo my thoughts exactly! This is one of those cases where It’s tough, for the ordinary person, to separate the science from the hype.

I’m hoping we are raising awareness of what is going on so that better minds than mine can start to sort this out and help us to understand the issues.

This is a story I will be watching and hopefully will be able to help write about again.

So you get a bloom of phytoplankton that “sucks up” carbon.

What happens when that phytoplankton dies?

Can this algae bloom live forever without further nutrient fertilization?

If not, what happens when all this phytoplankton dies?

What about the other ocean creatures that needed the sunlight that the phytoplankton used?

I don’t know the answers to all these questions, and don’t pretend to. I’m also smart enough to realize that any “environmentalist” concept that isn’t economically feasible in application isn’t worth pursuing. The problem with this type of thinking is that it entices the masses, with no thought necessary. These one paragraph solutions are just this decade’s snake oil.

Please, think about what you do before you do it (or even write about it). Give me some answers to these questions and I might really think about something like this, but all you have presented here is Propaganda.

So you get a bloom of phytoplankton that “sucks up” carbon.

What happens when that phytoplankton dies?

Can this algae bloom live forever without further nutrient fertilization?

If not, what happens when all this phytoplankton dies?

What about the other ocean creatures that needed the sunlight that the phytoplankton used?

I don’t know the answers to all these questions, and don’t pretend to. I’m also smart enough to realize that any “environmentalist” concept that isn’t economically feasible in application isn’t worth pursuing. The problem with this type of thinking is that it entices the masses, with no thought necessary. These one paragraph solutions are just this decade’s snake oil.

Please, think about what you do before you do it (or even write about it). Give me some answers to these questions and I might really think about something like this, but all you have presented here is Propaganda.

So you get a bloom of phytoplankton that “sucks up” carbon.

What happens when that phytoplankton dies?

Can this algae bloom live forever without further nutrient fertilization?

If not, what happens when all this phytoplankton dies?

What about the other ocean creatures that needed the sunlight that the phytoplankton used?

I don’t know the answers to all these questions, and don’t pretend to. I’m also smart enough to realize that any “environmentalist” concept that isn’t economically feasible in application isn’t worth pursuing. The problem with this type of thinking is that it entices the masses, with no thought necessary. These one paragraph solutions are just this decade’s snake oil.

Please, think about what you do before you do it (or even write about it). Give me some answers to these questions and I might really think about something like this, but all you have presented here is Propaganda.