Obama Wins The Nano Vote Too
We know that 76 Nobel Laureates endorsed Obama.
So much for Big Science.
But what about little science? Very teeny? Elections do have consequences for every interested party in science, from the greatest Nobel Laureates to the humblest specks of nano stuff.
Looks like they went heavily Obama, too.
And no wonder, with the war on science we just survived.
The kind assistant Professor John Hart of the University of Michigan helped these tiny nanovoters in his care add their voice to the science vote for Nanobama.
Via Nanobot
Photo credit: Nanobot
Go ahead. Put all your eggs in the Obama basket. Build up your expectations of “The One”. When he fails to deliver, and he will (he’s a politician, afterall), America will see their mistake in allowing the agenda-driven media to select our President, instead of actually getting to know the real issues and voting accordingly.
The article you linked was so obviously one sided and politically tilted that credibility was lost. The author followed his party’s line and went on a Palin attack. It was just another media messiah cheerleading article. No objectivity, just more “Look who else likes The One!”
Yes, scientist help to make the world a better place to live in, but it was scientists who came up with the most devastating weapons ever known, nuclear, chemical and biological. They’re not all nice guys.
Germany, in the 30’s & 40’s put a lot of stock in their scientists, too.
The common people resent being dictated and condescended to by “the thinkers”. That’s elitism, that’s Obama.
One little oddity about Obama supporters is that, while you number Nobel Laureates among them,a recent Zogby poll showed that a large number of his supporters didn’t know what party was in control of Congress, didn’t know who Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and William Ayers are, or were pathetically ignorant on several other major points.
However, thanks to our oh-so-honest and unbiased media salivating over “The Messiah”, they knew all about Palin’s negatives. That’s media honesty in America, today. Be sure to remember that when “change” goes bad.
Also consider that the last time America got desperate for a “change”, we got Carter, arguably the worst President of the 20th century (I know, I was there). Speaking of Carter, don’t forget that the Nobel Committee admitted awarding the recently outed anti-Semite Carter a Prize in part to “slap Bush”, and then they gave one to Gore for his unoriginal and even plagerized “Inconvienient Truth” (which turned out to be not so true, according to some Laureats and other non-awarded scientists. But what do they know?).
The Nobel Commitee has chosen to become political, therefore they have prostituted their credibility and have become another useless, self-congratulating group, not unlike the United Nations, or better yet the Oscar awarding Screen Actor’s Guild. (Hollywood halfwits, now there’s a group of real thinkers! And Obama supporters.)
Awardees of the past should be lamenting the degradation of their Prize by politicians and media hookers. What was once good, has now become tainted and cheapened.
Obama will be President, and as an American, I will do my best to support him whenever I can. I will certainly exercise my right to disagree with him, though. For the sake of the Nation, I sincerely hope my fears are proven to be false. But I’ve been around long enough to know that politicians will say and do ANYTHING to get elected, and then, more often than not, will absolutely fail to deliver. That’s a fact of political life in America.
Get ready for the let down and the hangover from all this giddy elation the media is foisting on us.
He’s just a man, he’s not a god!