<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Military&#8217;s New Green Ammunition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecoscraps.com/2009/02/17/the-militarys-new-green-ammunition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecoscraps.com/2009/02/17/the-militarys-new-green-ammunition/</link>
	<description>A Scrapbook of the Green World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Ammunition Will Save $500 Million &#124; EcoSilly</title>
		<link>http://ecoscraps.com/2009/02/17/the-militarys-new-green-ammunition/comment-page-1/#comment-26712</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Ammunition Will Save $500 Million &#124; EcoSilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/?p=1188#comment-26712</guid>
		<description>[...] [Via ecoscraps] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Via ecoscraps] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Military&#8217;s Green Ammunition: Eco-Friendly War? : Eco Child&#8217;s Play</title>
		<link>http://ecoscraps.com/2009/02/17/the-militarys-new-green-ammunition/comment-page-1/#comment-26095</link>
		<dc:creator>Military&#8217;s Green Ammunition: Eco-Friendly War? : Eco Child&#8217;s Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/?p=1188#comment-26095</guid>
		<description>[...] announcement of a new &#8216;Green Ammunition&#8216; for the military brings up an interesting question. Can war be eco-friendly? I find it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] announcement of a new &#8216;Green Ammunition&#8216; for the military brings up an interesting question. Can war be eco-friendly? I find it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Leahey</title>
		<link>http://ecoscraps.com/2009/02/17/the-militarys-new-green-ammunition/comment-page-1/#comment-25977</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Leahey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/?p=1188#comment-25977</guid>
		<description>The Army is already using the Mk281 at Fort Irwin.  The green ammunition is too advanced for the US industrial base, which means the Department of Army is involved in protecting existing &#039;arrangements&#039; until industry catches up.  The Department of Defense and Environmental Protection Agency would have cows if they knew PEO Ammunition was involved in protectionism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Army is already using the Mk281 at Fort Irwin.  The green ammunition is too advanced for the US industrial base, which means the Department of Army is involved in protecting existing &#8216;arrangements&#8217; until industry catches up.  The Department of Defense and Environmental Protection Agency would have cows if they knew PEO Ammunition was involved in protectionism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Leahey</title>
		<link>http://ecoscraps.com/2009/02/17/the-militarys-new-green-ammunition/comment-page-1/#comment-70734</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Leahey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/?p=1188#comment-70734</guid>
		<description>The Army is already using the Mk281 at Fort Irwin.  The green ammunition is too advanced for the US industrial base, which means the Department of Army is involved in protecting existing &#039;arrangements&#039; until industry catches up.  The Department of Defense and Environmental Protection Agency would have cows if they knew PEO Ammunition was involved in protectionism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Army is already using the Mk281 at Fort Irwin.  The green ammunition is too advanced for the US industrial base, which means the Department of Army is involved in protecting existing &#8216;arrangements&#8217; until industry catches up.  The Department of Defense and Environmental Protection Agency would have cows if they knew PEO Ammunition was involved in protectionism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

